<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Memristor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.memristor.org/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.memristor.org</link>
	<description>Science Advocacy through Emerging Technology Prototyping</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:48:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IM Flash (IMFT, Intel and Micron) hit 25nm NAND Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.memristor.org/news/178/imft-im-flash-intel-micron-25nm-nand</link>
		<comments>http://www.memristor.org/news/178/imft-im-flash-intel-micron-25nm-nand#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IM Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memristor.org/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As written about earlier, the intel and micron co-development company IM Flash (IMFI) is announcing theyve reached a 25nm NAND design and manufacturing milestone. 


This is great news for SSD and flash memory markets, although not necessarily for competitors. Still, the ONFI (Open NAND Flash Interface) consortium as a whole stands to benefit in part&#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.memristor.org/news/178/imft-im-flash-intel-micron-25nm-nand/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung settles Rambus Lawsuit: 900 mill</title>
		<link>http://www.memristor.org/news/176/samsung-settles-rambus-lawsuit-900-mill</link>
		<comments>http://www.memristor.org/news/176/samsung-settles-rambus-lawsuit-900-mill#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memristor.org/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Samsung Electronics Co. settled on a payout of $900 million over five years, resolving an old, and completely labyrinthine lawsuit with Rambus Inc. over their memory chips.
The two competitors, in addition to the settlement which involves stock buybacks and other sordid accounting payment details, also stated that they have signed a &#8220;memorandum of understanding&#8221; relating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.memristor.org/news/176/samsung-settles-rambus-lawsuit-900-mill/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>X25-M Intel SSD Toolbox Firmware Upgrade for Windows 7 OS Problems</title>
		<link>http://www.memristor.org/news/172/x25-m-intel-ssd-toolbox-firmware-upgrade-windows-7-os</link>
		<comments>http://www.memristor.org/news/172/x25-m-intel-ssd-toolbox-firmware-upgrade-windows-7-os#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ssd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memristor.org/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its being reported in Computer World that the Intel release of the SSD Toolkit firmware upgrade software was pulled after it was found to crash both the Intel X25-M G2 160GB and 80GB SSD drives:
&#8220;We have been contacted by users with issues with the 34-nanometer Intel SSD firmware upgrade and are investigating. We take all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.memristor.org/news/172/x25-m-intel-ssd-toolbox-firmware-upgrade-windows-7-os/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Braidwood NAND V. SSD V. Numonyx V. Intel</title>
		<link>http://www.memristor.org/news/166/intel-braidwood-nand-cache</link>
		<comments>http://www.memristor.org/news/166/intel-braidwood-nand-cache#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>memoryman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flash Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memristor.org/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
On the heels of new rumors about Micron possibly picking up Numonyx from Intel comes a websphere discussion about the possible threat Braidwood, Intel&#8217;s new native flash memory module currently spec&#8217;d for the first or second quarter of 2010, may pose to the emerging SSD market. Braidwood is promoted as an inexpensive motherboard NAND flash [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.memristor.org/news/166/intel-braidwood-nand-cache/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flexible Flash Memory on the horizon</title>
		<link>http://www.memristor.org/prototypes/164/flexible-flash-memristor-memory</link>
		<comments>http://www.memristor.org/prototypes/164/flexible-flash-memristor-memory#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototypes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memristor.org/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The US National Institute of Standards and Technology has developed a form of memristor built on a flexible substrate, its being widely reported. The paper, titled A Flexible Solution-Processed Memristor, details the researchers at NIST were able create a 14 day window for the non-volatile memristive state:
The Nist research team created the memristor using [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.memristor.org/prototypes/164/flexible-flash-memristor-memory/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: 2008 UC Berkeley Memristor Symposium</title>
		<link>http://www.memristor.org/reference/videos/156/video-2008-uc-berkeley-memristor-symposium</link>
		<comments>http://www.memristor.org/reference/videos/156/video-2008-uc-berkeley-memristor-symposium#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.memristor.org/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2008 UC Berkeley/Merced Symposium on memristors and memristive technology explored the potential of memristors and memristive systems and nano-electronic circuits. The videos have recently been posted:
Part 1:

Part 2:

Part 3:

Part 4:

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.memristor.org/reference/videos/156/video-2008-uc-berkeley-memristor-symposium/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
